The Dowsing Rubric
I recently submitted an answer to a homeopathy quiz offered on a website as a
challenge to students. I did not use the traditional 
rubric taught in homeopathy schools, which is a method of listing the symptoms and then scoring them- I dowsed for the remedy that would most benefit the patient mentioned in the quiz who had great thirst and painful menses, and came up with ‘Alumina’. I am still not sure if this was a live case or a made up one. I then read about Alumina and confirmed the symptoms were covered and satisfied myself that they were. I anxiously submitted my answer, of course wanting confirmation back that it was a good selection. At first the teacher did not acknowledge my pick as being good or bad, but she questioned my ‘rubric’ and went on to say that there were only 2 possibilities- Sulphur and Nat-mur. I humbly confided that I am a radiesthesia operator and do not use rubrics. I am guessing that both she and her students use homeopathy software to solve these brain teasers- computers with alga rhythms that are created as the computer is used again and again. Computer selection is accurate but sterile, and is always missing the ‘gut feeling’ and ‘artful’ aspect.
I would like to give myself credit for being an excellent remedy dowser. My selections have always proven to be spot on. It appears to me, because of my unorthodox ways, this teacher is not going to give me as much as an inch when it comes to the Alumina. As a teacher, she was most concerned with my method of selection and wanted to see a rubric, and I as a dowser wanted confirmation that my remedy covered the symptoms. After much back and forth I got this…
“Whatever method you’re using to find remedies, and I’m not sure what it is, but, it sure didn’t help you solve this case. You might consider actually enrolling in a homeopathy school so you can learn homeopathy.”
Wow, she sounded a little miffed! She probably just spent the last 6-12 years studying homeopathy and then teaching it- not to mention what this education might have cost- and then someone like me waltzes in with no books or repertoirizing, using a pendulum not a computer software, and simply asks my intelligent higher self, the self that already knows everything in the universe, to make a remedy selection.
I just went back to the dowsing table to ask again.
- Does Alumina cover great thirst? Yes
- Does Alumina cover painful menses? Yes
- Is Alumina the remedy that will most benefit the patient in Elaine’s homeopathic quiz? Yes
Without stepping on any toes, I stand by my pick, Alumina.
Hi Madeleine,
Thank you for this post. It is the same as a doctor not wanting anything to do with alternative medicine because he/she studied medicine for a lot of years and it costs a lot of money and then someone “knows” in some way what is wrong with someone with the help of the Higher Self. If only doctors would be more willing to work with alternative healers, then a lot of (painfull) medical procedurs/exams would not be necessary.
Hélène
I was surprised to find a ‘fellow alternative healer’ to be like that, but I guess the ‘doctors’ of every modality, are a bit arrogant.
Hola, me puedes ayudar por favor?, tengo a una paciente con artritis en hombros , codos, creo que tiene osteoatritis.
Gracias por tu apoyo.
Hola Mar,
olio tirando è buono per l’artrite e dolori articolari. anche Bioplasma (i sali tissutali 12). I rimedi omeopatici più comunemente utilizzati per l’artrite sono: Rhus tox, Bryonia, apis e belladonna.
Rhus tox è più adatto per le persone che soffrono di miglioramento dei sintomi di muoversi, ma tendono a diventare rigida da fermo.
Bryonia è meglio per le persone i cui sintomi peggiorano di movimento.
Apis è adatto a persone con, bruciore, dolore pungente caldo e gonfiore.
Belladonna è più adatto per le persone che soffrono di una rapida insorgenza e violenta di lancinante dolore artritico e le articolazioni rosse, calde e gonfie.
Spero che questo aiuta.